Determining Liability in Vermont Car Accidents During Winter

Vermont winters make driving dangerous, but the law is clear: winter weather does not excuse negligent driving. When roads are slick with snow and ice, drivers are still responsible for slowing down, increasing following distance, and maintaining control. Understanding how winter conditions factor into liability, what evidence is most crucial, and how insurance companies argue these cases is critical to protecting your rights after a crash.

At Sabbeth Law, we represent people injured in winter collisions across Vermont. We know the rules that govern these cases, the evidence that proves negligence despite bad weather, and the tactics insurers employ to minimize claims. We act quickly to secure weather records, road maintenance logs, and scene documentation before conditions change.

Our mission is straightforward: protect your rights, hold negligent drivers accountable, and fight for the full compensation you deserve.

We make this case with evidence. We gather data on the road surface, visibility, temperature, and precipitation; examine the vehicle’s condition; and assess the decisions that affected control. We then present a clear narrative that demonstrates how negligence—not the weather—caused your injuries.

The “Reasonably Prudent Person” Standard in Winter

During the winter season, a reasonably prudent (responsible) driver in Vermont is expected to:

  • Reduce speed significantly below the posted limit when traction or visibility is limited.
  • Increase the following distance to account for longer stopping times, which are often five, six, or more seconds.
  • Ensure that proper equipment are in place, including winter tires with adequate tread, working wipers and defrosters, functioning headlights and taillights, and clear windows and mirrors.
  • Clear the snow and ice from the roof so debris does not blow onto other vehicles.
  • Use headlights in low-visibility conditions, including heavy snow and whiteouts.

Failing to meet these winter-specific duties is more than a poor choice; it constitutes a breach of the standard of care required in the situation. When that breach causes a crash, the negligent driver is liable.

If you were injured or lost a loved one in a winter collision, our Vermont car accident lawyer can help you pursue a personal injury or wrongful death claim. We build the record the court needs to apportion fault fairly and to recognize the full value of your losses.

Contact Us

Impact of Vermont’s Harsh Winter Conditions on Accident Claims

Snow, ice, whiteouts, and deep cold change how vehicles are handled and how drivers must respond. Although they do not erase responsibility, courts in Vermont take winter conditions into account by asking a simple, decisive question: given what the driver knew or should have known about the conditions, did they act reasonably?

If their actions or inactions result in your injury, then you may be entitled to compensation. As your trusted attorney, we show how winter conditions influenced decision-making and where those decisions fell short. That includes speed choices on packed snow, headlight use during a squall, following distance on icy grades, and equipment choices like tires and wipers.

Courts expect drivers in Vermont to know that bridges freeze first, that black ice hides on shaded stretches, and that snow squalls can drop visibility without warning. Failure to account for these realities points to negligence.

Vermont’s Modified Comparative Fault (51% Rule)

Vermont follows a Modified Comparative Fault system, often referred to as the 51% rule. You can recover damages if you are 50% or less at fault; your percentage of fault reduces your recovery. If you are 51% or more at fault, you cannot recover.

Here is what that looks like in winter driving: suppose you slid on black ice and struck a vehicle ahead, but the other driver had no headlights during a whiteout. A jury might assign fault 60% to the driver who failed to use headlights and 40% to the driver who slid because they were traveling too fast for conditions. In that scenario, the 40% driver still recovers 60% of their damages. This is a practical rule that reflects how two or more decisions often combine to cause a crash.

We use this rule to your advantage. Insurers often argue that the weather was the true cause. We push back by showing how specific choices— such as speed, following distance, and headlight use—caused the collision, then we document the losses that flow from that negligence.

Equipment Liability: Snow Tires, Visibility, and Maintenance

Winter equipment can sometimes decide liability. Experienced and prudent drivers would possess certain equipment that would protect them as they traverse the Vermont roads during winter. Some of these equipment are:

  • Snow tires and tread depth: Vermont does not mandate snow tires by statute, but courts often view worn or all-season tires as inadequate when conditions are severe. Using inappropriate or bald tires can be strong evidence of negligence.
  • Visibility and snow-roof hazards: Snow and ice must be removed from windows and mirrors, and the roof must be cleared. When snow blows off a roof at highway speed and causes a crash, the driver who failed to clear it may be liable.
  • Lights, wipers, and defrosters: If headlights, taillights, wipers, or defrosters are not functioning properly, visibility and reaction times are compromised. Operating without functioning safety equipment jeopardizes everyone on the road and weighs heavily in fault analysis.

We document tires through photos and service records, measure tread depth, and capture the condition of the windshield, lights, and roof at the scene wherever possible.

Negligence and Winter Road Conditions: Is Weather an Excuse?

Manchester Truck Accident Lawyer Legal Support for Victims common cause

We hear it often: “I slid—it was just the weather.” Vermont courts do not accept winter weather as a blanket defense. Sliding typically indicates a loss of control, which points to negligence unless the driver took all reasonable precautions. The law asks whether a reasonable driver would have slowed further, left more room, or equipped their vehicle differently.

Courts also tend to reject the notion that ice or snow constitutes an “Act of God,” which typically absolves liability in most cases. Conditions may be treacherous, but they are also predictable in Vermont winters. Drivers are expected to anticipate and adapt to these.

What Counts as Reasonable Winter Driving?

Reasonable winter driving includes:

  • Driving well below the posted limit when traction or visibility is compromised.
  • Extending the following distance to allow for slow, controlled stops.
  • Using headlights at any time the visibility is limited by snowfall, dusk, or whiteout.
  • Clearing snow and ice from all glass, mirrors, lights, and the roof.
  • Choosing tires with sufficient winter tread and maintaining brakes, wipers, and defrosters.

When a driver fails to meet these duties, winter weather does not shield them from responsibility.

Can You Recover Damages After Sliding on Ice or Snow?

If a collision involves sliding on ice or snow, compensation is still possible. The key is to establish who failed to act reasonably for the conditions and to apply Vermont’s Modified Comparative Fault rules to the facts. Even if you share some responsibility, you may still recover a portion of your damages.

We develop this proof from the ground up:

  • We show how the other driver’s speed, following distance, or equipment choices caused or worsened the crash.
  • We document visibility, lighting, and traction at the scene and match those facts to safety rules drivers must follow.
  • We identify all parties whose actions contributed to the collision and apportion fault fairly.

What Evidence Is Necessary for Winter Car Accidenet Claims?

Rapid documentation is critical, especially when a car accident happens in winter. Some of the most crucial pieces of evidence include:

  • Weather reports: Historical data from the National Weather Service can pinpoint temperature, precipitation, wind, and visibility at the time of the crash. These records support arguments that drivers should have adjusted their behavior. We retain meteorological experts when needed to tie conditions to the collision timeline.
  • VTrans records: Vermont Agency of Transportation logs show when roads were plowed or treated. These records clarify whether drivers should have anticipated slick conditions and whether maintenance might have been a contributing factor.
  • Photos of the road: Capture the exact surface before conditions change—black ice sheen, packed snow, slush, wheel ruts, or snowbanks. Include wide shots, close-ups, and reference points (lane markings, signs, guardrails). Time-stamp your images when possible. If you cannot take photos due to injury, ask a witness or family member to help. If police respond, request the report number and ask whether scene photos were taken.
  • Medical care records: Seek treatment right away and follow all recommendations. Early records link your injuries to the crash and show their severity.
  • Insurance communications: Keep copies of all emails and letters and record call details. Do not give recorded statements to the other driver’s insurer without counsel.
  • Vehicle inspections: Obtain a detailed repair estimate and preserve damaged parts when possible. Impact patterns and component failures can help reconstruct speed and control.
  • Expert support: We work with accident reconstructionists and, when necessary, biomechanical and medical experts to explain how the crash occurred and how it caused your injuries.

We understand how winter weather impacts liability in Vermont car accidents, as we handle these cases every season. We act fast to secure time-sensitive evidence, confront insurer arguments, and present a clear, fact-based case for liability and damages.

Take Action to Protect Yourself After a Vermont Winter Car Accident

Harsh conditions increase the likelihood of crashes, but they do not absolve the duty to drive safely. Liability turns on whether drivers took reasonable precautions for the conditions, such as slowing down, leaving room, using headlights, and maintaining winter-ready equipment. And even if you share some responsibility, Vermont’s Modified Comparative Fault system allows you to recover compensation, provided you are not more than 51% at fault.

As experienced Vermont car accident lawyers, we know that the strongest cases begin with prompt, thorough documentation: weather records, VTrans logs, scene photos, witness statements, medical records, and expert analysis.

At Sabbeth Law, we focus on personal injury representation grounded in careful investigation and strong advocacy. We understand the pressure you face after a winter crash—medical bills, missed work, pain, and uncertainty—and we are determined to protect your rights at every step. While no outcome is guaranteed, we leverage our experience and our network to build the most compelling case possible.

If you were hurt in a winter collision, reach out to us so we can secure the evidence and protect your claim. Contact our team as soon as possible. We will review your case, explain your options, and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Contact Us